Parenthetical Scene 6.1: When Mystery Babylon falls, it is burned by the 10 kings and removed from existence forever — like when God overthrew the previous one in Isaiah 13:19-20. Once burned by the ten kings, the kings of the world lament her fall because they cannot buy from her, as their cities still stand.

Very Important: Mystery Babylon might feel like the city we just read about in Revelation 16. Yet, how can the merchants of the earth mourn for Mystery Babylon, as we are about to read, after all the cities of the earth have fallen, if it is the same as Jerusalem? Do they not mourn their own cities? And, why is the woman riding the dragon if the beast and the kings are aligned with one another? If Mystery Babylon is Jerusalem, are they not already overpowering her at the time of Revelation 13 and the abomination of desolation? All the mountains are removed already in Revelation 16, and Jerusalem is split into three parts; is she not already destroyed? The answer seems simple: they are not the same, and Revelation 16 is not a lead into Revelation 17 as a linear sequence of events.

Important Note: The woman has the power and is riding the red dragon. The ten kings will give their power to the dragon so that she can be removed, Revelation 17:13.

Bookends: Woman "the whore" at the start (17:1) and ends with the bride (woman) of Christ (19:7).

Important Note: Isaiah 13:19-20, Jeremiah 50:39 say of the Babylon of the Old Testament that it "shall be no more inhabited for ever". This shows that Mystery Babylon is likely a spiritual, typological successor to the Babylon of the Old Testament, rather than to the Babylon in Mesopotamia (Shinar) that would be reestablished. Thus, the Old Testament seems to disqualify the building of a new Babylon in Mesopotamia or Shinar.

17And there came one of the seven messengers who had the seven vials, and talked with me, saying unto me, Come on [r.0], I will show unto you the judgment of the great whore [r.1] that sits upon many waters:
[r.0]

Re 17:1, Re 21:9δεῦρο is a Greek particle used as a direct summons, meaning “come!” or “come now!” It is not a standard verb of motion, nor does it primarily indicate direction to a specific place. Rather, it expresses an immediate, personal call, often urgent or insistent. For this reason, it is here rendered as “come on,” which captures the force of a direct and engaging summons rather than a simple instruction to a location such as “come here.”

[art]
2 With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication [r.2].
[r.2]

Re 14:8, Re 17:2, Re 18:3

3 And he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness [r.3] [r.4]: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast (d), full of names of blasphemy [r.5], having seven heads and ten horns [r.6] [r.7].
[fn]

Red Dragon, the Devil, and Satan — This (d) designation appears to function as a synchronizing literary device, linking back to the beginning of Revelation 12, where the fiery-red dragon is first introduced. This suggests that the fall of Mystery Babylon and the rise or appearance of the red beast align in timing with the dragon’s emergence in Revelation 12. Accordingly, the attack on the woman (Rev 12) and the destruction of the whore (Rev 17) may be understood as occurring in close proximity, both carried out by the red beast in concert with the ten kings.

[fn]

The names of blasphemy are on the scarlet-colored beast, not on the woman. The phrase "the name of blasphemy" or "names of blasphemy" on the head of the sea beast (Rev 12) is not sufficient to identify it as this red beast of Revelation 17:3 as being the sea beast with confidence. Although the red beast in 17:3 may resemble the sea beast, it is actually the fiery-red dragon. We know the beast in 17:3 is the dragon because it ascends from the bottomless pit, and only Satan is said to come out of the pit. By contrast, the sea beast is cast directly into the lake of fire. Other reasons include: the beast (dragon) is noted as having first "seven heads" and then "ten horns," whereas the seat beast leads with "ten horns" instead, the Dragon is red, whereas we do not know the color of the sea beast, and the sea beast ascends from the sea, not the bottomless pit. So, up to this point, we were not told that the dragon bears a name of blasphemy, and now we know.

[fn]

No diadems shown, seem to indicate the ten kings and the seven heads do not have power at this time; the whore does.

[r.3]

Re 17:3, Re 21:10When John is taken to see the whore, she is seen in the wilderness; when he is taken to see the bride, New Jerusalem, he is taken to a mountain. These locations mirror the city he is viewing.

[r.4]
[r.5]

Re 13:1, Re 17:3

[r.6]

Re 12:3, Re 17:3, Re 17:7Seven heads are mentioned before the ten horns.

[r.7]
(d)

Re 17:3, Re 11:7, Re 12:3, Re 17:8The Devil and Satan. Red dragon. Not to be confused with the sea beast due to the names of blasphemy (the red dragon has implied names of blasphemy in 17). Satan is the one who comes from the bottomless pit, which requires a key to open; it is not a place anyone can open – the sea beast accends from the sea, not the bottomless pit. Many other subtle proofs of this being Satan also exist in the text.

4 And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet color, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand [r.8] full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication:
[r.8]

Re 17:4, Jeremiah 51:7When connected to Jeremiah 51, it seems that God's sovereignty is being displayed in the whore and later with the 10 kings.

5 And upon her forehead [r.9] was a name written, a mystery [r.10], Babylon The Great, The Mother Of Harlots And Abominations Of The Earth [r.11].
[fn]

On Mystery Babylon, a name is written on her forehead; the name she has is distinct from the mark or the beast, and the beast itself. She is distinct from the beast by her name.

[r.10]

Re 1:20, Re 10:7, Re 17:5, Re 17:7μυστήριον — Mystery

[art]
[art]
6 And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus [r.12]: and when I saw her, I wondered with great admiration.
[r.12]

Re 17:6, Re 18:24

7 And the messenger said unto me, Why did you marvel? I will tell you the mystery [r.13] of the woman, and of the beast that carries her, which has the seven heads and ten horns [r.14] [r.15].
[r.13]

Re 1:20, Re 10:7, Re 17:5, Re 17:7μυστήριον — Mystery

[r.14]

Re 12:3, Re 17:3, Re 17:7Seven heads are mentioned before the ten horns.

[r.15]
8 The beast (d) that you saw was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit [r.16] [r.17], and go into perdition [r.18]: and they who dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life [r.19] from the foundation of the world, when they behold that was, and is not, and is to come [r.20].
[fn]

Perdition appears to be the lake of fire.

[r.16]
[r.18]

Re 17:8, Re 20:10Lake of fire.

[r.20]

Re 17:8, Re 17:11

(d)

Re 17:8, Re 11:7, Re 12:3, Re 17:3The Devil and Satan. Red dragon. Not to be confused with the sea beast due to the names of blasphemy (the red dragon has implied names of blasphemy in 17). Satan is the one who comes from the bottomless pit, which requires a key to open; it is not a place anyone can open – the sea beast accends from the sea, not the bottomless pit. Many other subtle proofs of this being Satan also exist in the text.

Important Note: The seven heads are both mountains, and there are seven kings on them. The woman appears to sit on the seven mountains. Note that the beast has a 7th head, which will be a king. If that king is the sea beast, then the scarlet coloured beast can not be the sea beast.

It is speculated who these kings are. If we do not inject the historical before the prophetic, it is safer to assume the seven kingdoms and seven kings follow prior biblical accounts, mapping to: Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Greece as fallen. Rome is at the time Revelation was written (~90 A.D.). The ten kings and the little horn are yet to come; when they appear, Jesus will appear.

We know these seven heads are not all Rome, but the ten kings might be in a future sense, because Scripture already gives us the interpretive pattern in Daniel, Zechariah, and Ezekiel. Revelation is building on that prophetic framework. We must prioritize the Old Testament context first, allowing its symbols and trajectories to guide our understanding before importing later historical explanations. In other words, we should exhaust what Revelation itself has already drawn from the OT prophets before reaching for external context. Only after that should Rome even enter the discussion, not as a starting point, and never as something that overrides the prophetic foundation already laid in the text.

9 And here is the mind which has wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains [r.21], on which the woman sits,
[r.21]
10 and are seven kings [r.22] [r.23]: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he comes, he must continue a little. (dl)
[r.22]
[r.23]

Re 12:3, Re 17:10Seven heads are mountains and are seven kings (17:10); those kings seem to be the "seven diadems" (12:3).

(dl)

Re 17:10, Re 12:12Here, the fiery-red dragon of Revelation 12 and the 7th king of Revelation 17 are each said, using the same Greek term (ὀλίγον), to have but a “little” time to remain, mirroring each other.

If the sea beast were to be the eighth as well, this would not be possible, for he cannot return from the lake of fire. The dragon, however, does return from the bottomless pit, and is thus eligible to be the eighth, whereas the sea beast is very likely not.

11 And the beast that was, and is not [r.24], even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goes into perdition [r.25].
[r.24]

Re 17:8, Re 17:11

[r.25]

Re 17:11, Re 20:10Lake of fire.

Important Note: This "one hour" is not coming across as an idiom, but it is not totally clear. Revelation is already full of language that allows it to present abstract time frames, such as "continue a little" (17:10); here we see "one hour," as we do many others: 5 months, 1260 days, and so on. So the pattern of Revelation is to make it fairly clear when specific time frames are described, we are to take them literally. It is vague when it means to be like the "time, time, and a half time".

However, with the whore, the time of "one hour" seems to toggle between one day and one hour. So it is not totally clear what "one hour" might mean when it comes to the whore, or if that vagueness spreads over to the other one hour. It would be safest to call one hour, one hour, and that one hour fits in one day, which is what the toggle of the phrase "one hour" and "one day" is pointing to.

12 And the ten horns which you saw are ten kings [r.26], who have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour [r.27] with the beast.
[r.26]

Re 13:1, Re 17:12With the beast are 10 kings (17:10); those kings seem to be the "ten diadems" (13:1).

[r.27]

Re 17:12, Re 18:10, Re 18:17, Re 18:19Together at the same time, a literal hour.

13 These have one mind, and shall give their might and power unto the beast [r.28].
[fn]

In unity, they act together at the same moment, not separately over a long period. They have one hour and one mind. The text makes this extremely clear: they function as a single, unified entity.

[r.28]

Re 17:13, Re 17:14, Re 17:16, Re 17:17Based on the text, this appears to rule out the view that the ten kings are successive rulers of Rome, since they are depicted as reigning together in unity at the same time. Those who interpret these kings as a sequence of Roman emperors face difficulty reconciling this collective action in a literal sense, as the passage explicitly presents them working in concert. Such an interpretation requires imposing a framework onto the text that it does not naturally support.

14 These shall make war [r.29] with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings [r.30]: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful [r.31].
[fn]

Likely at Har-Magedon with the sea beast and false prophet because of the following "Lord of lords, and King of kings" titles which are shown at the time of the battle.

[r.29]
[r.30]

Re 17:14, Re 19:16

[r.31]

Re 17:14, Re 19:14

15 And he said unto me, The waters which you saw, where the whore sits, are peoples, and multitudes, and nations, and tongues [r.32].
[r.32]

Re 11:9, Re 13:7, Re 14:6, Re 17:15The world

[art]

Important Note: This Babylon is destroyed by the ten kings; what is likely Jerusalem as Babylon is destroyed by God with the 7th vial. The destruction and total removal of Mystery Babylon is not described in any way like the winepress in Revelation 16:19.

16 And the ten horns which you saw, they and the beast shall hate the whore, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and burn her with fire [r.33] [r.34].
[r.33]
[r.34]
17 For God has put in their hearts to fulfill his will [r.35], and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast [r.36], until the words of God shall be fulfilled.
[r.35]

Re 17:17, Jeremiah 51:53

[r.36]
18 And the woman whom you saw is that great city [r.37] [r.38] , which reigns over the kings of the earth.
[r.38]

Re 11:8, Re 16:19, Re 17:18, Re 18:10, Re 18:16, Re 18:18, Re 18:19The phrase “the great city” (ἡ πόλις ἡ μεγάλη) appears to function as a theologically loaded designation in Revelation, used predominantly for Babylon (Rev 17:18, 18:10, 18:16, 18:18, 18:19), yet applied to Jerusalem in Revelation 11:8—“where also our Lord was crucified.” In that context, Jerusalem is “spiritually” called Sodom and Egypt, indicating a transformation from its identity as the “holy city” (Rev 11:2) into one aligned with paradigmatic centers of rebellion and judgment. This suggests that Revelation is not using the term merely geographically, but associating it with a city’s spiritual condition and opposition to God.

Because Revelation 17:18 defines “the great city” as the one that “reigneth over the kings of the earth,” it may be inferred that the designation corresponds to a center of dominant, God-opposing power. When read alongside Revelation 11:8, this raises the possibility that Jerusalem, in its corrupted state and in connection with the rise of the beast, temporarily participates in that same category (It is possible to infer from Daniel 11:45 and 2 Thessalonians 2:4 that Jerusalem becomes a focal point of the final ruler’s activity). However, while this pattern allows for a typological relationship—because Babylon is “the great city”—the text does not explicitly state that the title transfers sequentially or that Jerusalem becomes identical with “Mystery Babylon.” Thus, “the great city” may function as a theological marker for a ruling, rebellious center.

As for Revelation 16:19, also marked as "the great city", it does not automatically become Jerusalem or Mystery Babylon; such a claim must remain a reasoned inference drawn from the book’s patterned language rather than an explicit textual claim. And, as it is not likely Mystery Babylon for numerous reasons, it very well could be Jerusalem as the ruling city of the sea beast.